The Exhibition
1. The title of the exhibit was "Clyfford Still"
2. The theme of the exhibit was works done by the artist Clyfford Still, an American painter who lived from 1904-1980 that worked a lot with Abstract Expression with his work
The Gallery
1. The lighting in the gallery was fairly light throughout the entire place, but extra light was shined on each one of the paintings to put more emphasis on them.
2. The walls were strictly white, most likely to contrast with the colors of the paintings.
3. The interior architecture of the exhibit was plain, as the only thing that it had were a couple benches to sit on. Besides this, it was basically made of three rooms (2 small room and a larger room). Not a whole lot to it.
4. All the art were wall paintings, and each labeled at a single spot in a clockwise order. So the movement of the space was mostly a clockwise viewing. Look at one, move to the right, and so on.
The Artwork
1. All the art works were done by Clyfford Still's, with each small room having 4 paintings each and several more in the larger room. The paintings were in 2 different sizes, either about 6.5 ft. x 6 ft., or 9 ft. x 8 ft., and not in any order throughout the exhibit.
2. Each artwork started on the same tan canvas and framed with the same wood finish. The method of abstract painting was a common theme for all of Still's paintings
3. Besides the size of the paintings, the choice of colors were about the only thing that was different. Still's had a array of color choices he used from painting to painting. Some would have minimal paint and a lot of canvas, others were painted throughout the whole thing. Some were darker with choices of black and blue paint, others focused on being lighter with red, yellow and white paints.
4. Each painting had the same exact simple wood frame, not too large, really just enough to make it look minimal.
5. Each painting had a label to it on the wall with painting information. In the smaller rooms, each painting info was posted together in one spot, but let you know that the labels from top to bottom went clockwise with the paintings. In the larger room, the labels were posted right next to the paintings.
6. All the paintings were pretty spaced out, as it was common that each wall only had one painting on it. This put about 10-15 ft. in between each painting.
-Clyfford Still, "October 1950", oil on canvas, 1950, 6.5 ft. x 6 ft.
What I see is a lot of abstract thought with Still's. The colors do not seem to be in any sort of particular form. It more free and has no direction. Best described as a non-representational art piece. What it really reminds me of is the Doppler Radar for the weather that we see on the news every night. What I think Still's is trying to say is just be free, just let the brush do the work.
-Clyfford Still, "November 1950 No. 2", oil on canvas, 1950, 6.5 ft. x 6 ft.
This painting is less involved than the first painting. The only colors that are present black, yellow, and a lighter tan than the canvas. This one also does not seem to have too much direction or any particular form, and is non-representational. This painting doesn't seem to remind me of anything really. What I think the artist is trying to stay is kept it simple and don't over complicate things.
-Clyfford Still, "November 1954", oil on canvas, 1954, 9 ft. x 8 ft.
This painting follows the abstract style of Still's. What I see is not a lot of paint, with a lot of the color focusing on the white. The black takes up very little, and also goes for the orange. This too is a non-representational painting. This painting reminds me of a cloud over the western desert mountains. What I think Still's is trying to say in this is that everyday images can be put on canvas, even if they do not directly look like the image itself.
These are photos of the exhibit at the Albright-Knox Art Gallery
4. I thought going in with a clear mind that I did look at the exhibit in a much different way. Still’s artworks may not seem to complex, and with a bias mind I probably would have never entered that room on the gallery. With the questions and Art Criticism guidelines, I was able to open my view to art in a much different way. The way each painting was placed in the room, to the similar frames, to the free flowing images, it all meant something. With a biased mind, I would have never realized any of this.